Tight marketing budget? Pre-produced content could be the answer

Tight Marketing Budget Illustration
© Can Stock Photo Inc.

Today’s post is a re-post, reprinted with permission from author Sam Lewis of the U.K.-based Ember Television. Sam and his colleague Robin Powell are like the peanut butter to my chocolate in the world of financial communication service providers. While I focus on the words, Ember Television’s Regis Media team helps evidence-based advisers create high-quality videos and illustrations.  words and pictures work best together in helping you reach out to your ideal audiences. I encourage you to reach out to either of us for more information. Thanks, Sam and Robin, for letting me share our conversation here! 

PS: “Bespoke” is a British term for custom-crafted, so “bespoke content” means it is custom-written. Even I, a word-nut, learn something new every day by looking beyond my usual borders!  

——————————————————

It’s well-known that for content marketing to be effective, content has to be posted regularly. A Hubspot study found that businesses that posted 15 times or more per month saw their web traffic increase by 500%. When faced with statistics like this, content marketing can seem like a beast that constantly needs feeding.

The problem is that we’re now expected to produce more content but with the same budgets. For some organisations, like financial services firms, this can seem like an impossible task.

Continue reading “Tight marketing budget? Pre-produced content could be the answer”

Word Trends: Should You Actively Manage Your Evidence-Based Messaging?

retirement-cliche
© Can Stock Photo Inc.

As an evidence-based adviser, you already know better than to actively chase investment trends or pick hot stocks. But what about language trends? How actively should you pick the words you use when managing your marketing and communications?

Just as stocks and bonds go hot and cold with little rhyme or reason, so can words and phrases. If you’ve been knocking around the business block for a while, you may remember now-stale expressions such as “Total Quality Management” and “continuous improvement.” Ugh, I never did like those, even when they were popular. More recently, I’ve been hearing an abundance of business-speak about leveraging things, creating value propositions and being impactful. These too shall pass, I hope. Continue reading “Word Trends: Should You Actively Manage Your Evidence-Based Messaging?”

Some Active Advice About Passive Mistakes

mistakes
© Can Stock Photo Inc.

As a fiduciary to your clients’ and their personal wealth, the last thing you want to do is reveal when (not if) you’ve made a mistake. News flash: Your clients already know that you are human. And humans make mistakes. Of course we want to avoid errors to begin with, but when they happen despite our best intentions, don’t compound them by going passive in communicating them. By “passive,” I’m referring to sentence structure:

“Mistakes were made.”

In case your high school English teacher failed to drill it into you, this is a passively constructed sentence. Instead of the subject performing the verb, the verb is performed on the subject. Why does that matter? With no “I,” “he/she” or “they” in sight, there’s no telling who owns the problem, intends to fix it, is sorry it happened and will ensure that it never happens again. The buck has NOT stopped here; it’s still roaming around planning its next attack. Continue reading “Some Active Advice About Passive Mistakes”

Are You an Investment Advisor or an Investment Adviser?

vowelsTo heck with a day. What a difference a vowel can make. For example, are you an investment advisor or investment adviser? What about your firm? How do you spell it there?

Dictionaries are not very enlightening. Merriam-Webster as well as Dictionary.com unhelpfully suggest: ad•vis•er also ad•vi•sor. The Associated Press Stylebook hints at a solution by resolutely stating: “Adviser | Not advisor.” Unfortunately, that doesn’t really account for the fact that “Registered Investment Adviser” seems just plain wrong. Continue reading “Are You an Investment Advisor or an Investment Adviser?”

Party On, Evidence-Based Advisors: 2015 Communication Resources: Part(y) One

owlIt used to be, if the evidence-based advisor community threw a party for all of the specialized providers assisting them with their corporate communications, the chip dip would form a surface crust long before it needed to be replenished. Fortunately, if one keeps on partying, the world eventually joins in.

Here is a partial list of some communication support services and resources available to evidence-based advisors these days. The list is by no means exhaustive. Some are silvery new, while others are old, golden friends. Either way, chances are you’ll discover at least one new possibility worth exploring.

Which resources do you depend on? Navigate over to where this piece is posted on LinkedIn, and you can add your favorite resources there in the comments area. Let’s keep the party growing. Continue reading “Party On, Evidence-Based Advisors: 2015 Communication Resources: Part(y) One”

Courting Your Corporate Communications

Courting Corporate Communications
© Can Stock Photo Inc.

How are your corporate communications like a courtship? For both, it’s crucial to proceed in the proper order, at the proper time. Otherwise, like proposing marriage to your blind date, what could be a smooth move could flop fast.

Project Planning: As Easy as One, Three, Two

As advisors plan for their communications, here are questions I sometimes field on initial queries:

  1. How do we get more traffic on our website?
  2. How can you help with our blog/social media/white paper/book?
  3. How much will it cost?

These are great questions … in time. But before you can properly address “How?” make sure you’ve nailed “What?” Continue reading “Courting Your Corporate Communications”

The Opposite of Passive Investing Is … ?

Opposite of Passive Investing
© Can Stock Photo Inc.

A few months ago, I took a mighty leap and publicly renounced passive investing in my blog – at least as a term for describing the same long-held evidence-based investment strategy to which I remain a loyal adherent. Since that spring post, it’s been gratifying to see momentum continuing to build in favor of evidence-based investing:

  1. The LinkedIn group “Passive Investment Professionals” renamed itself to “Evidence-Based Advisors” and recently topped 1,000 members.
  2. In the U.K. a colleague let me know that the firm where she is marketing manager (and that is also the behind-the-scenes sponsor for the excellent Sensible Investing forum) is revamping its materials to replace “passive” with “evidence-based.”
  3. As I’ve been asking advisors across the U.S. and Canada about their preferred terminology, the term “passive” has become almost universally passé. More often than not, they’re embracing “evidence-based investing” instead.

Carpe Diem, Evidence-Based Advisors

So there you have it. Faster than the masses have been snagging iPhone 6s at their local distributors, “evidence-based investing” has begun taking the world by storm, or at least by an appreciable drizzle.

Which brings us to an unprecedented opportunity.

Continue reading “The Opposite of Passive Investing Is … ?”

Passive Investing Is Dead … Long Live Evidence-Based Investing

Evidence-Based Investing
© Can Stock Photo Inc.

It’s official. After more than a year of hinting around, I’m ready to say it: I NO LONGER RECOMMEND PASSIVE INVESTING. Allow me to clarify. I remain 110% convinced that it remains your duty and privilege as a fiduciary advisor to help investors understand and apply the same investment principles that have long guided them past Wall Street’s freak shows, onward to their main events. But like it or not, the term, “passive investing” is no longer the best term for describing your continued calling. Henceforth, I’m recommending “evidence-based investing” as the new term for the same cause.

I say “like it or not,” because I’m sorry that the terminology has changed. I’m sorry for at least a couple of reasons. Continue reading “Passive Investing Is Dead … Long Live Evidence-Based Investing”

Cutting Caveats from Your Corporate Communications

Information Overload
© Can Stock Photo Inc.

When sharing important but complicated financial concepts such as investment strategy, fiduciary duty and compensation structure, how do you decide what to leave in and what to omit as “TMI,” or knowledge overkill, harmful to your cause?

Learning vs. Sharing Knowledge

Step one is to recognize the difference between the wisdom you’ve acquired, versus how much of that wisdom to pass on to others in the form of effective advice.

Continue reading “Cutting Caveats from Your Corporate Communications”

Who’s on First, and Are We on Second? Using First-Person Pronouns Like a Pro

Abbott & Costello Stamp
© Can Stock Photo Inc.

This month’s blog post is inspired by a recent e-mail from one of my advisor friends: “Hi, communications expert.” (He was off to a great start!) “Can I get your thoughts on whether it would be better to use ‘I’ or ‘we’ in the [project]? As a sole proprietor, I struggle with this periodically; perhaps you do, too.  Sometimes I come down on one side, sometimes on the other.”

 What’s in a Name?

Even before Abbott and Costello pitched their familiar “Who’s on First, What’s on Second” routine, naming conventions on who we are as authors have amused and confused us in our personal and professional communications. And by the way, it’s not just a conundrum for sole proprietors. Larger firms face similar challenges. Large or small, you’re still a gathering of individual characters with individual viewpoints to air and share. Continue reading “Who’s on First, and Are We on Second? Using First-Person Pronouns Like a Pro”